PaintShop Pro Tube Depot Proudly Presents:
- Artists permissions - permission for use must be VERY specific -
can the person requesting permission actually alter the image?
I want you to make note of a few things:
- "...why you want to use it where and how"
- "Permission is
-"Yes, you may use my work for your my PERSONAL
-"Yes, you have permission to use my work for link-ware"
-"Yes, you have permission to use and alter my artwork
as described for person use and link-ware
- "When someone gets permission from an artist applies ONLY TO THE
PERSON WHO WROTE HIM. Not to the managers of your groups, not to your
sister. If you have a graphics design site that have 5 other designs as
managers, too - THEY EACH MUST ASK FOR PERMISSION."
As you can see, permission for use must be specific - can the person
requesting permission actually alter the image? Are they allowed to create
things for others or only for themselves? Do they have permission to make
sigs/snags/tags or just to display a few pieces of work?
Also, permission letters are good only for the person who wrote to the
artist - they can not give permission to anybody else! Could there be
exceptions? Of course there could, but the requestor would have to be very
clear that they're asking for permission for their management team/graphic
makers/membership to make graphics for themselves &/or for others.
The unfortunate part is that you can never be sure what the person writing
to the artist actually requested (usually, only the letter from the artist
(or parts of it) are posted for members to see). Even worse, you can't be
sure the permissions are actually legit. So, you must take these
"permissions" in conjunction with "red flags"/"green lights."
I, myself, am very wary of people using artists work for making things like
sigs/snags/tags for other people to download (and even more leery of
"blanket permissions" - meaning allowing any manager/graphic maker/member to
use the images). It has been my experience that more artists grant
permission for personal use web sets (and, perhaps, for link-ware), than for
other types of graphics.
The reason, I believe, is because it's far easier to link a web set to an
artists site than it is to expect it for sigs & snags. Again, this is just
my opinion - there certainly are artists who are more lenient (or, perhaps
less net savvy) and it's always good to check the artist's TOU yourself and
to check periodically that terms haven't been changed.
Something that has come about since I first wrote these lessons is Pay To
Use (PTU) art - that is, people can purchase packages of works (generally
tubes, I think - graphics you can use to create sigs/tags, etc.) that they
can use however they wish. Many are distributed through licensing companies,
some do it on their own. While this is probably a safer, albeit more
example, it is against MSN Group's CoC for general or mature groups to have
content or link to sites/groups (even with a non-clickable URL) with this
"erotic" artwork. Although they may tell you it's ok to link to them, it's
really up to you to determine whether a site/group has this sort of content
& err on the side of caution. I prefer to think of mature as being PG-13
(nothing bared, nothing suggestive) rather than R rated (as a lot of groups
seem to think, in my experience)
In summary: If a group has no "red flags" and has some "green lights"
they're permissions are probably legit; be wary of "blanket permissions;" if
you are at all suspicious, check out the artists terms yourself; remember
that website hosts may not allow links to groups/sites with adult content.
And thus endeth this round of the Safe Graphics School.
The self-quiz is linked below - good luck!
Use this Graphic to Link to this page. Save to your own hard drive...do not
house tut from Country Scraps, and apple tut from MidnightPSP.
Webset created with Jasc Paint Shop Pro
HTML code and graphics by ~Bel~
?2003 L. Reark, all rights reserved
Fair Use Info